The inflation response playbook.
Aluminum up 25%. Freight costs climbing. Ingredient prices volatile. Here are the strategies that protect your margins without destroying your shelf position.
Aluminum up 25%. Freight costs climbing. Ingredient prices volatile. Here are the strategies that protect your margins without destroying your shelf position.
The beverage industry is in a sustained cost squeeze. Between tariff-driven material increases, rising freight rates, and volatile ingredient markets, most brands are operating with thinner margins than they planned for. The question is not whether costs are going up — it is how you respond. This playbook lays out the strategies that protect margins without torpedoing your distribution relationships or shelf position. For a deeper look at the underlying cost pressures, see our guide to Managing Margin Pressure During Cost Inflation.
Beverage brands are facing cost pressure from multiple directions simultaneously, which makes this environment fundamentally different from a single-input price spike. The main cost drivers in 2025–2026 include:
The compound effect is significant. A brand that has absorbed 3–4% cost increases across each of these categories is looking at a total COGS increase of 8–12% — which, at typical beverage margins, can cut net profitability by half or more.
The most common mistake during inflationary periods is waiting too long to respond. Every month you absorb higher costs without adjusting your pricing or operations, you are training your distributors and retailers to expect your current price as permanent. When you eventually do raise prices, the increase feels larger and meets more resistance. Act early, act incrementally, and communicate proactively.
Not every cost increase justifies a price increase. The decision depends on several factors that are specific to your competitive position and market dynamics.
Industry data suggests that beverage price increases of 3% or less are generally absorbed by the market without measurable volume impact. Increases of 3–6% may see a small volume dip (2–5%) that typically recovers within one quarter. Increases above 6% carry real risk of permanent volume loss, especially in competitive categories. Structure your increases accordingly — two 3% increases six months apart are almost always better received than one 6% increase.
Once you decide to adjust pricing, how you implement the increase matters as much as the amount. Here are the three primary approaches:
| Strategy | Mechanism | Best For | Watch Out For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full pass-through | Raise FOB by the full cost increase | Strong brands, inelastic categories, when competitors also raising | Volume loss if you move first; distributor pushback |
| Partial absorption | Raise FOB by half the cost increase, absorb the rest | Competitive markets, mid-tier brands, moderate cost increases | Margin still erodes, though more slowly |
| Delayed pass-through | Absorb costs for 3–6 months, then implement full increase | New brands, seasonal peaks, when waiting for competitor signals | Cash flow impact; risk of normalized expectations |
| Format adjustment | Hold price, reduce pack size or switch to lower-cost packaging | Highly price-sensitive categories, retail-focused brands | Consumer backlash ("shrinkflation"); regulatory labeling changes |
How you communicate a price increase to your distributor determines how smoothly it will be implemented. The best practice is a structured notification 30–60 days before the effective date that includes: the specific cost drivers (with data), the percentage increase, the effective date, and how the increase compares to competitors who have already moved. Lead with transparency, not apology.
For guidance on structuring your supplier pricing strategy, including how to position price changes within your broader FOB architecture, see our dedicated guide.

The complete guide to three-tier pricing — margins, formulas, and benchmarks in one PDF.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Before raising any prices, examine whether you can improve your blended margin by shifting the mix of what you sell. This is often the highest-impact, lowest-risk inflation response available.
Most brands have significant margin variation across their portfolio. A premium single-serve SKU might carry a 55% gross margin while a value multi-pack runs at 38%. Shifting even 5–10% of your volume from low-margin to high-margin SKUs can offset a meaningful portion of cost inflation without any price increase.
Multi-packs (12-packs, variety packs) often have lower per-unit margins than 4-packs or 6-packs because of the promotional pricing they attract. Evaluate whether your promotional calendar is over-indexing on low-margin formats. Redirecting promotional spend toward smaller, higher-margin packs can improve blended margins by 2–4 percentage points.
On-premise accounts (bars, restaurants) typically generate higher FOB per case than off-premise (retail stores) because on-premise pricing is less transparent and less competitive. If your on-premise distribution is underdeveloped, investing in that channel can improve your portfolio-level margin even as off-premise costs rise.
Run your full portfolio through Alculator's calculator at current margins, then model what happens if you shift 10% of volume from your lowest-margin SKU to your highest-margin SKU. You may be surprised how much blended margin improves without touching a single price point.
Cost reduction is the other side of the margin equation. Every dollar you take out of COGS is a dollar that stays in your gross margin — and unlike price increases, cost reductions don't risk volume loss.
The 25% aluminum tariff has changed the packaging cost equation. Brands that were committed to cans should re-evaluate: glass may now be cost-competitive for certain formats, and lighter-gauge cans or alternative suppliers can reduce per-unit costs. Even small changes — switching from a full-body shrink sleeve to a simple pressure-sensitive label, for example — can save $0.02–$0.04 per unit.
If you have not rebid your ingredient and packaging contracts in the past 12 months, you are likely overpaying. Get competitive quotes from at least two alternative suppliers for your top five cost items. Even if you don't switch, having competitive bids gives you leverage to renegotiate with your current suppliers.
Improving canning line speed from 70% to 85% utilization reduces your labor and overhead cost per case by roughly 18%. Focus on reducing changeover time between SKUs, minimizing fill-level waste, and investing in preventive maintenance to reduce unplanned downtime. These are not glamorous improvements, but they compound meaningfully over thousands of cases.
The brands that navigate inflationary periods best are those that have a plan before costs spike. Here is a framework for building pricing resilience into your business:
Define specific thresholds that trigger action. For example: "If total COGS per case increases more than 5% from our annual plan, we will implement Strategy A. If it increases more than 10%, we will implement Strategy B." Having pre-defined triggers removes the emotional paralysis that causes many brands to wait too long.
Review your actual COGS versus plan every quarter. Compare your FOB to competitors every quarter. Review your margin by SKU and by channel every quarter. This cadence is frequent enough to catch trends before they become crises, but infrequent enough to smooth out noise.
Keep a prioritized list of actions you can take at different cost-increase thresholds: operational improvements at 3%, mix optimization at 5%, partial price pass-through at 8%, full pass-through at 10%+. When the trigger is hit, you already know what to do.
Your distributor and key retail partners should never be surprised by a price increase. Build cost-transparency into your relationship so that when you do need to raise prices, the conversation starts with shared understanding rather than confrontation.
Open the calculator and adjust your COGS inputs to see how cost changes flow through to shelf price.
Open the Calculator →